Part 17 (2/2)
”Melancholy ever cronies with Sublimity, and Courage is sublime,” said Augustus, with the pomp of a maxim-maker.
[A maxim which would have pleased Madame de Stael, who thought that philosophy consisted in fine sentiments. In the ”Life of Lord Byron,” just published by Mr. Moore, the distinguished biographer makes a similar a.s.sertion to that of the sage Augustus: ”When did ever a sublime thought spring up in the soul that melancholy was not to be found, however latent, in its neighbourhood?” Now, with due deference to Mr. Moore, this is a very sickly piece of nonsense, that has not even an atom of truth to stand on. ”G.o.d said, Let there be light, and there was light!”--we should like to know where lies the melancholy of that sublime sentence. ”Truth,” says Plato, ”is the body of G.o.d, and light is his shadow.” In the name of common-sense, in what possible corner in the vicinity of that lofty image lurks the jaundiced face of this eternal bete noir of Mr.
Moore's? Again, in that sublimest pa.s.sage in the sublimest of the Latin poets (Lucretius), which bursts forth in honour of Epicurus, is there anything that speaks to us of sadness? On the contrary, in the three pa.s.sages we have referred to, especially in the two first quoted, there is something splendidly luminous and cheering. Joy is often a great source of the sublime; the suddenness of its ventings would alone suffice to make it so. What can be more sublime than the triumphant Psalms of David, intoxicated as they are with an almost delirium of transport? Even in the gloomiest pa.s.sages of the poets, where we recognize sublimity, we do not often find melancholy. We are stricken by terror, appalled by awe, but seldom softened into sadness. In fact, melancholy rather belongs to another cla.s.s of feelings than those excited by a sublime pa.s.sage or those which engender its composition. On one hand, in the loftiest flights of Homer, Milton, and Shakspeare, we will challenge a critic to discover this ”green sickness” which Mr. Moore would convert into the magnificence of the plague. On the other hand, where is the evidence that melancholy made the habitual temperaments of those divine men? Of Homer we know nothing; of Shakspeare and Milton, we have reason to believe the ordinary temperament was const.i.tutionally cheerful. The latter boasts of it. A thousand instances, in contradiction to an a.s.sertion it were not worth while to contradict, were it not so generally popular, so highly sanctioned, and so eminently pernicious to everything that is manly and n.o.ble in literature, rush to our memory. But we think we have already quoted enough to disprove the sentence, which the ill.u.s.trious biographer has himself disproved in more than twenty pa.s.sages, which, if he is pleased to forget, we thank Heaven posterity never will. Now we are on the subject of this Life, so excellent in many respects, we cannot but observe that we think the whole scope of its philosophy utterly unworthy of the accomplished mind of the writer; the philosophy consists of an unpardonable distorting of general truths, to suit the peculiarities of an individual, n.o.ble indeed, but proverbially morbid and eccentric. A striking instance of this occurs in the laboured a.s.sertion that poets make but sorry domestic characters. What! because Lord Byron is said to have been a bad husband, was (to go no further back for examples)--was Walter Scott a bad husband, or was Campbell, or is Mr. Moore himself? why, in the name of justice, should it be insinuated that Milton was a bad husband, when, as far as any one can judge of the matter, it was Mrs. Milton who was the bad wife? And why, oh! why should we be told by Mr. Moore,--a man who, to judge by Captain Rock and the Epicurean, wants neither learning nor diligence,--why are we to be told, with peculiar emphasis, that Lord Bacon never married, when Lord Bacon not only married, but his marriage was so advantageous as to be an absolute epoch in his career? Really, really, one begins to believe that there is not such a thing as a fact in the world!]
”Now for the hedge!” cried Lovett, unheeding his comrades; and his horse sprang into the road.
The three men now were drawn up quite still and motionless by the side of the hedge. The broad road lay before them, curving out of sight on either side; the ground was hardening under an early tendency to frost, and the clear ring of approaching hoofs sounded on the ear of the robbers, ominous, haply, of the c.h.i.n.ks of ”more attractive metal” about, if Hope told no flattering tale, to be their own.
Presently the long-expected vehicle made its appearance at the turn of the road, and it rolled rapidly on behind four fleet post-horses.
”You, Ned, with your large steed, stop the horses; you, Augustus, bully the post-boys; leave me to do the rest,” said the captain.
”As agreed,” returned Ned, laconically. ”Now, look at me!” and the horse of the vain highwayman sprang from its shelter. So instantaneous were the operations of these experienced tacticians, that Lovett's orders were almost executed in a briefer time than it had cost him to give them.
The carriage being stopped, and the post-boys white and trembling, with two pistols (levelled by Augustus and Pepper) c.o.c.ked at their heads, Lovett, dismounting, threw open the door of the carriage, and in a very civil tone and with a very bland address accosted the inmate.
”Do not be alarmed, my lord, you are perfectly safe; we only require your watch and purse.”
”Really,” answered a voice still softer than that of the robber, while a marked and somewhat French countenance, crowned with a fur cap, peered forth at the arrester,--”Really, sir, your request is so modest that I were worse than cruel to refuse you. My purse is not very full, and you may as well have it as one of my rascally duns; but my watch I have a love for, and--”
”I understand you, my lord,” interrupted the highwayman. ”What do you value your watch at?”
”Humph! to you it may be worth some twenty guineas.”
”Allow me to see it!”
”Your curiosity is extremely gratifying,” returned the n.o.bleman, as with great reluctance he drew forth a gold repeater, set, as was sometimes the fas.h.i.+on of that day, in precious stones. The highwayman looked slightly at the bauble.
”Your lords.h.i.+p,” said he, with great gravity, ”was too modest in your calculation; your taste reflects greater credit on you. Allow me to a.s.sure you that your watch is worth fifty guinea's to us, at the least.
To show you that I think so most sincerely, I will either keep it, and we will say no more on the matter; or I will return it to you upon your word of honour that you will give me a check for fifty guineas payable, by your real bankers, to 'bearer for self.' Take your choice; it is quite immaterial to me!”
”Upon my honour, sir,” said the traveller, with some surprise struggling to his features, ”your coolness and self-possession are quite admirable.
I see you know the world.”
”Your lords.h.i.+p flatters me!” returned Lovett, bowing. ”How do you decide?”
”Why, is it possible to write drafts without ink, pen, or paper?”
Lovett drew back, and while he was searching in his pockets for writing implements, which he always carried about him, the traveller seized the opportunity, and suddenly s.n.a.t.c.hing a pistol from the pocket of the carriage, levelled it full at the head of the robber. The traveller was an excellent and practised shot,--he was almost within arm's length of his intended victim,--his pistols were the envy of all his Irish friends. He pulled the trigger,--the powder flashed in the pan; and the highwayman, not even changing countenance, drew forth a small ink-bottle, and placing a steel pen in it, handed it to the n.o.bleman, saying, with incomparable sang froid: ”Would you like, my lord, to try the other pistol? If so, oblige me by a quick aim, as you must see the necessity of despatch. If not, here is the back of a letter, on which you can write the draft.”
The traveller was not a man apt to become embarra.s.sed in anything save his circ.u.mstances; but he certainly felt a little discomposed and confused as he took the paper, and uttering some broken words, wrote the check. The highwayman glanced over it, saw it was written according to form, and then with a bow of cool respect, returned the watch, and shut the door of the carriage.
Meanwhile the servant had been s.h.i.+vering in front, boxed up in that solitary convenience termed, not euphoniously, a d.i.c.key. Him the robber now briefly accosted.
”What have you got about you belonging to your master?”
”Only his pills, your honour! which I forgot to put in the--”
<script>