Part 95 (1/2)

142 ”possible copying mechanism for the genetic material”

J. D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick, ”Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids,” Nature, April 25, 1953.

143 science of cloning, genetic engineering, and genetic screening

See, for example: Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, ”Commercialization of Academic Biomedical Research,” June 89, 1981; Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, ”Genetic Screening and the Handling of High-Risk Groups in the Workplace,” October 1415, 1981.

144 and fifteen years later they succeeded with Dolly

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Human Genome Project, ”Cloning Fact Sheet,” May 11, 2009, ic material”

Brock, ”Cloning Human Beings.”

149 clear form of harm to the individual who is cloned or to society

Brian Alexander, ”(You)2,” Wired, February 2001; ”Dolly's Legacy,” Nature, February 22, 2007; Steve Connor, ”Human Cloning Is Now 'Inevitable,' ” Independent, August 30, 2000; John Tierney, ”Are Scientists Playing G.o.d? It Depends on Your Religion,” New York Times, November 20, 2007.

150 a line of identical embryonic stem cells that reproduced themselves

David Cyranoski, ”Cloned Human Embryo Makes Working Stem Cells,” Nature, October 5, 2011.

151 Several countries

Tierney, ”Are Scientists Playing G.o.d?”

152 has broken this modern taboo against human cloning