Volume I Part 2 (2/2)
[Footnote 9: ”The Bulgarians, in their historical, ethnographical and political frontiers.” Text in four languages. Berlin, 1917.]
[Footnote 10: _La Macedoine_, by Simeon Radeff. Sofia, 1918.]
[Footnote 11: _Obzor Chronografov_, published by Professor Popov in 1863.]
[Footnote 12: _Pester Lloyd_, June 21, 1917.]
[Footnote 13: _Introduction a l'Histoire de l'Asie._ Paris, 1896.]
[Footnote 14: In a monograph on the 600th anniversary of the Church of St. Mary at Celje (Celje, 1910) there is reproduced a contemporary narrative of the funeral of Count Ulrich.
After describing how the widow, the n.o.ble lady Catharine, had with dire wailing gone round the altar and offered sacrifice, being followed by all the congregation, it proceeds: ”Da diss geschehen gieng wieder herfur ein geharnischter Mann, der Namb zu sich Schilt, Helmb, Wappen, legte sich auf die Erden, vnd striche gar lauth, ganz erbarmlich vnd gar Claglich mit h.e.l.ler stimbe drei mahl nacheinander Graffen zu Cilli, vnd Nimmehr zerreiss die Panier, Zerbrach die Wappen da war Allererst ein Clagen, da.s.s es nicht einen Menschen, sondern ein harten stain hete Erbarmen Mogen.”]
[Footnote 15: Cf. A lecture delivered by Sir Arthur Evans before the Royal Geographical Society, January 10, 1916.]
[Footnote 16: Cf. _La Fine della Serenissima_, by Ricciotti Bratti. Milan, 1919.]
[Footnote 17: _Sudosteuropaische Fragen_, by Hermann Wendel.
Berlin, 1918.]
[Footnote 18: His equipment, as M. Charles Loiseau (in _Le Balkan Slave et la Crise Autrichienne_, Paris, 1898) remarks very truly, ”n'est pas ba.n.a.l.” One of his historians relates that he was furnished with a sword, a lance, javelins and arrows trimmed with falcons' feathers, sometimes also with a sabre and a small axe. He was garbed in a cloak of wolf's skin, using the same skin for his cap, round which was wound a dark piece of cloth. On his saddle was a scarf of silk. The reins of his horse were gilded, and he carried in his right hand a javelin of iron, gold and silver, weighing 150 lb.
(?), and this he balanced on the left side with a large skin of wine. On his back was a magnificent cloak, and behind him there was a folded tent.]
[Footnote 19: _Monumenta Serbica_, edited by F. Miklosic.]
II
FIGHTING THE DARKNESS
THE VENETIANS IN DALMATIA--METHODS OF THE TURK--THE SLAVS WHO MIGRATED--THE CONSOLATION OF THOSE WHO REMAINED--GOOD LIVING IN HUNGARY--THE PROTESTANT INFLUENCE--DUBROVNIK, REFUGE OF THE ARTS--HOW SHE SMOOTHED HER WAY--HER COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE--HER NORTHERN KINSMEN AND THE MILITARY FRONTIERS--THE OPPRESSIVE OVERLORDS OF THE YUGOSLAVS--THE GREAT MIGRATION UNDER THE PATRIARCH--ACTIVITIES OF THE SOUTHERN SLAVS UNDER THE HABSBURGS--THE POSITION OF THEIR CHURCH--SERBS a.s.sIST THE BULGARIAN RENASCENCE--THE GERMAN COLONISTS IN THE BANAT--THE SOUTHERN SLAV COLONISTS AND THEIR RELIGION--BUNJEVCI, OKCI AND KRAOVANI.
THE VENETIANS IN DALMATIA
One might argue that the Slav of Dalmatia had no grat.i.tude, because when Serbia and Bosnia were utterly under the Turk, when the Slovenes of Carniola, Carinthia and Southern Styria suffered between 1463 and 1528 no less than ten Turkish invasions, when in the middle of that fifteenth century the crescent floated over all Croatia and only the fortified towns of the seacoast and the islands remained in the Christian hands of Venice, whom a fair number of these towns and islands had called in to protect them, surely one might argue that it was not seemly if the local population, Croats and Serbs, detested the Venetians. And on hearing that not long ago an orator in the Italian Parliament exclaimed, ”I cani croati!”--a description that was greeted with a whirlwind of applause--you possibly might argue that the Speaker should have reprimanded him because ingrat.i.tude is not a quality a.s.sociated with dogs.
As we gaze at the splendid structures, the palaces, the forts, the magnificent cathedral of ibenik that was begun in 1443, the loggia of Trogir and Hvar, the loggia of Zadar--”a perfect example,” we are told, ”of a public court of justice of the Venetian period”--the towers on the old town-walls of Korcula, as we gaze at all those elegant and useful and robust and picturesque buildings which bear the sign of the Lion of St. Mark, do not the complaints of the disgruntled population of that period tax our patience?
We may waive the fact that the ibenik cathedral was left unfinished for centuries, being only completed by public subscription under the Austrians; we may overlook the fact that the Lion of St.
Mark was sometimes placed on a building not erected by the Venetians.
This we can see at the Frankopan Castle on Krk, and elsewhere. But it would be unjust if we held Venice up to blame on account of some exuberant citizens. There are many other buildings in Dalmatia which undoubtedly were built by the Venetians: palaces and forts and walls and loggia which are perfect examples of a Venetian court of justice.
Some one may ask why the Venetians built no churches that were half as beautiful as those--say, St. Grisogono at Zadar, the cathedrals of Zadar and Trogir, and so forth--which were constructed under the Croatian kings. Well, the possession of such churches would have been a source of pride to the Dalmatians (and have kept awake the national spirit more than did the forts and loggia), and the Venetians wanted to preserve the people from the sin of pride. There was also a feeling that the Dalmatian forests were a source of pride to the people. So the Venetians removed them. They were able to make use of the wood for their numerous vessels, for the foundations of their palaces, and as an article of export to Egypt and Syria.[20]
<script>