Part 6 (2/2)

Powell propped himself up on one elbow and studied the sc.r.a.p of paper, frowning. Down below, beneath the deck, there was an abrupt sound of power, and Brant felt the cold metal on which he was lying sink beneath him. Bennett was changing course, trying to throw them within range of his defenses. Both men began to slide sidewise.

Powell did not appear to be worried; evidently he knew just how long it took to turn a s.h.i.+p of this size and period. He pushed the piece of paper back. On the last free s.p.a.ce on it, in cramped letters, was: Throw something at it.

”Ah,” said Brant. Still sliding, he drew off one of his heavy shoes and hefted it critically. It would do. With a sudden convulsion of motion he hurled it.

Fat, crackling sparks crisscrossed the room; the noise was ear-splitting. While Bennett could have had no idea what Brant was doing, he evidently had sensed the sudden stir of movement and had triggered the high-tension current out of general caution. But he was too late. The flying shoe plowed heel-foremost into the autopilot with a rending smash.

There was an unfocused blare of sound from the voder more like the noise of a siren than like a human cry. The Astrid rolled wildly, once. Then there was silence.

”All right,” said Brant, getting to his knees. ”Try the controls, Powell.”

The UN pilot arose cautiously. No sparks flew. When he touched the boards, the s.h.i.+p responded with an immediate purr of power.

”She runs,” he said. ”Now, how the h.e.l.l did you know what to do?”

”It wasn't difficult,” Brant said complacently, retrieving his shoe. ”But we're not out of the woods yet. We have to get to the stores fast and find a couple of torches. I want to cut through every nerve-channel we can find. Are you with me?”

”Sure.”

The job was more quickly done than Brant had dared to hope. Evidently the living s.h.i.+p had never thought of lightening itself by jettisoning all the equipment its human crew had once needed. While Brant and Powell cut their way enthusiastically through the jungle of efferent nerve-trunks running from the central computer, the astronomer said: ”He gave us too much information. He told me that he had connected the artificial nerves of the s.h.i.+p, the control nerves, to the nerve-ends running from the parts of his own brain that he had used. And he said that he'd had to make hundreds of such connections. That's the trouble with allowing a computer to act as an independent agent-it doesn't know enough about interpersonal relations.h.i.+ps to control its tongue.... There we are. He'll be coming to before long, but I don't think he'll be able to interfere with us now.”

He set down his torch with a sigh. ”I was saying? Oh, yes. About those nerve connections: if he had separated out the pain-carrying nerves from the other sensory nerves, he would have had to have made thousands of connections, not hundreds. Had it really been the living human being, Bennett, who had given me that cue, I would have discounted it, because he might have been using understatement. But since it was Bennett's double, a computer, I a.s.sumed that the figure was of the right order of magnitude. Computers don't understate.

”Besides, I didn't think Bennett could have made thousands of connections, especially not working telepathically through a proxy. There's a limit even to the most marvelous neurosurgery. Bennett had just made general connections, and had relied on the segments from his own brain which he had incorporated to sort out the impulses as they came in-as any human brain could do under like circ.u.mstances. That was one of the advantages of using parts from a human brain in the first place.”

”And when you kicked the wall-” Powell said.

”Yes, you see the crux of the problem already. When I kicked the wall, I wanted to make sure that he could feel the impact of my shoes. If he could, then I could be sure that he hadn't eliminated the sensory nerves when he installed the motor nerves. And if he hadn't, then there were bound to be pain axons present, too.”

”But what has the autopilot to do with it?” Powell asked plaintively.

”The autopilot,” Brant said, grinning, ”is a center of his nerve-mesh, an important one. He should have protected it as heavily as he protected the main computer. When I smashed it, it was like ramming a fist into a man's solar plexus. It hurt him.”

Powell grinned too. ”K.O.,” he said.

THE MACAULEY CIRCUIT.

by Robert Silverberg.

Today giant electronic computers are translating material from foreign languages, writing poems, and even composing music. They do it in a mindless, mechanical way, like the oversized adding machines that they are-merely following instructions laid down by their human designers, performing step after step after step according to previously programmed rules. Only the great speed with which such computers work conceals the plodding nature of the way they go about their business.

What of a machine that showed some originality, though? We are already uncomfortably close to the era of computers that write their own programs-which is almost the same thing as saying, computers that can think. This story considers the possible effect on the arts that such a machine would have.

I don't deny I destroyed Macauley's diagram; I never did deny it, gentlemen. Of course I destroyed it, and for fine, substantial reasons. My big mistake was in not thinking the thing through at the beginning. When Macauley first brought me the circuit, I didn't pay much attention to it-certainly not as much as it deserved. That was a mistake, but I couldn't help myself. I was too busy coddling old Kolfmann to stop and think what the Macauley circuit really meant.

If Kolfmann hadn't shown up just when he did, I would have been able to make a careful study of the circuit and, once I had seen all the implications, I would have put the diagram in the incinerator and Macauley right after it. This is nothing against Macauley, you understand; he's a nice, clever boy, one of the finest minds in our whole research department. That's his trouble.

He came in one morning while I was outlining my graph for the Beethoven Seventh that we were going to do the following week. I was adding some ultrasonics that would have delighted old Ludwig-not that he would have heard them, of course, but he would have felt them-and I was very pleased about my interpretation. Unlike some synthesizer-interpreters, I don't believe in changing the score. I figure Beethoven knew what he was doing, and it's not my business to patch up his symphony. All I was doing was strengthening it by adding the ultrasonics. They wouldn't change the actual notes any, but there'd be that feeling in the air which is the great artistic triumph of synthesizing.

So I was working on my graph. When Macauley came in I was choosing the frequencies for the second movement, which is difficult because the movement is solemn but not too solemn. Just so. He had a sheaf of paper in his hand, and I knew immediately that he'd hit on something important, because no one interrupts an interpreter for something trivial.

”I've developed a new circuit, sir,” he said. ”It's based on the imperfect Kennedy Circuit of 2261.”

I remembered Kennedy-a brilliant boy, much like Macauley here. He had worked out a circuit which almost would have made synthesizing a symphony as easy as playing a harmonica. But it hadn't quite worked-something in the process fouled up the ultrasonics and what came out was h.e.l.lish to hear-and we never found out how to straighten things out. Kennedy disappeared about a year later and was never heard from again. All the young technicians used to tinker with his circuit for diversion, each one hoping he'd find the secret. And now Macauley had.

I looked at what he had drawn, and then up at him. Hewas standing there calmly, with a blank expression on his handsome, intelligent face, waiting for me to quiz him.

”This circuit controls the interpretative aspects of music, am I right?”

”Yes, sir. You can set the synthesizer for whatever esthetic you have in mind, and it'll follow your instruction. You merely have to establish the esthetic coordinates-the work of a moment-and the synthesizer will handle the rest of the interpretation for you. But that's not exactly the goal of my circuit, sir,” he said, gently, as if to hide from me the fact that he was telling me I had missed his point. ”With minor modifications-”

He didn't get a chance to tell me, because at that moment Kolfmann came das.h.i.+ng into my studio. I never lock my doors, because for one thing no one would dare come in without good and sufficient reason, and for another my a.n.a.lyst pointed out to me that working behind locked doors has a bad effect on my sensibilities, and reduces the esthetic potentialities of my interpretations. So I always work with my door unlocked and that's how Kolfmann got in. And that's what saved Macauley's life, because if he had gone on to tell me what was on the tip of his tongue I would have regretfully incinerated him and his circuit right then and there.

Kolfmann was a famous name to those who loved music. He was perhaps eighty now, maybe ninety, if he had a good gerontologist, and he had been a great concert pianist many years ago. Those of us who knew something about pre-synthesizer musical history knew his name as we would that of Paganini or Horowitz or any other virtuoso of the past, and regarded him almost with awe.

Only all I saw now was a tall, terribly gaunt old man in ragged clothes who burst through my doors and headed straight for the synthesizer, which covered the whole north wall with its gleaming complicated bulk. He had a club in his hand thicker than his arm, and he was about to bash it down on a million credits' worth of cybernetics when Macauley effortlessly walked over and took it away from him. I was still too flabbergasted to do much more than stand behind my desk in shock.

Macauley brought him over to me and I looked at him as if he were Judas.

”You old reactionary,” I said. ”What's the idea? You can get fined a fortune for wrecking a cyber-or didn't you know that?”

”My life is ended anyway,” he said in a thick, deep, guttural voice. ”It ended when your machines took over music.”

He took off his battered cap and revealed a full head of white hair. He hadn't shaved in a couple of days, and his face was speckled with stiff-looking white stubble.

”My name is Gregor Kolfmann,” he said. ”I'm sure you have heard of me.”

”Kolfmann, the pianist?”

He nodded, pleased despite everything. ”Yes, Kolfmann, the former pianist. You and your machine have taken away my life.”

Suddenly all the hate that had been piling up in me since he burst in-the hate any normal man feels for a cyberwrecker-melted, and I felt guilty and very humble before this old man. As he continued to speak, I realized that I-as a musical artist-had a responsibility to old Kolfmann. I still think that what I did was the right thing, whatever you say.

”Even after synthesizing became the dominant method of presenting music,” he said, ”I continued my concert career for years. There were always some people who would rather see a man play a piano than a technician feed a tape through a machine. But I couldn't compete forever.” He sighed. ”After a while anyone who went to live concerts was called a reactionary, and I stopped getting bookings. I took up teaching for my living. But no one wanted to learn to play the piano. A few have studied with me for antiquarian reasons, but they are not artists, just curiosity-seekers. They have no artistic drive. You and your machine have killed art!”

I looked at Macauley's circuit and at Kolfmann, and felt as if everything were dropping on me at once. I put away my graph for the Beethoven, partly because all the excitement would make it impossible for me to get anywhere with it today and partly because it would only make things worse if Kolfmann saw it. Macauley was still standing there, waiting to explain his circuit to me. I knew it was important, but I felt a debt to old Kolfmann, and I decided I'd take care of him before I let Macauley do any more talking.

”Come back later,” I told Macauley. ”I'd like to discuss the implications of your circuit, as soon as I'm through talking to Mr. Kolfmann.”

”Yes, sir,” Macauley said, like the obedient puppet a technician turns into when confronted by a superior, and left. I gathered up the papers he had left me and put them neatly at a corner of my desk. I didn't want Kolfmann to see them, either, though I knew they wouldn't mean anything to him except as symbols of the machine he hated.

When Macauley had gone I gestured Kolfmann to a plush pneumochair, into which he settled with the distaste for excess comfort that is characteristic of his generation. I saw my duty plainly-to make things better for the old man.

<script>